Supply chain and logistics leaders
Managing modal strategy, network resilience and margin exposure under ongoing policy volatility
Inside the new rules of global trade
Based on analysis of more than one million U.S. customs entries, this report documents what changed next — not where supply chains source, but how they execute under pressure.
Companies responded to tariff stacking in two waves. The first was reactive. The second wave was structural. Those shifts held, persisted into 2026, and are now the new operating baseline.
growth in the 35–50% duty bracket in 2025
Modal rebalancing as companies repriced transit-tariff risk
Effective duty rates reached in some high-exposure categories
Mode selection was once a cost and service trade-off. Under tariff stacking, it became a reflection of how importers managed financial exposure.
Air and truck usage increased — and didn't revert. Ocean lost share in higher-risk, long-lead-time flows. Shipments were restructured to reduce exposure windows. These weren't isolated decisions. They were a recalibration of speed, control and financial risk across the network.
Duties didn't disappear. But its landscape got rewritten.
Bonded warehouse usage rose significantly. Classification complexity nearly doubled and stayed elevated. Entry structures shifted to align duty payment more closely with actual inventory movement. This is the early stage of something more consequential: tariff exposure managed as a live financial variable, not a fixed cost.
Routes didn't shift all at once. They evolved through testing, iteration and adjustment under real pressure.
New corridors emerged. Others collapsed under policy. Route patterns began to reflect experimentation ahead of sourcing changes, turning logistics data into a forward signal, not just a historical record.
Effective duty rates layered across multiple policies collapsed cost predictability almost overnight. What followed wasn't a single response; it was a sequence of adaptations, some of which faded and some of which persisted into 2026 and became the new operating baseline.
The tariff‑optimized supply chain is not a fixed strategy. It is an operating model in formation. One built for volatility, not stability.
It is characterized by:
Execution decisions made across multiple paths, not a single optimal plan
Tariff exposure treated as a variable, not a fixed cost
Optionality across modes, routes and entry strategies
Compliance functioning as enabling infrastructure
These aren’t nice-to-haves. They’re the foundation of competitive supply chain execution for the next decade.
The tariff era exposes the exact problem Intelligent Supply Chain Execution is built to solve. Critical decisions now happen across the gaps between systems, functions and workflows not inside one single application.
Traditional supply chains were built to be efficient. The tariff era has revealed the cost of it. Optimized supply chains need to be flexible and efficient. That means having multiple modes available, multiple origins qualified, multiple entry strategies ready and multiple routing options on the table — because when policy shifts, you need to move fast.
Maintaining that level of optionality at scale requires a different kind of infrastructure.
This isn’t about bolting AI onto a legacy stack. It’s about building execution intelligence that turns optionality from a strategic principle into something companies can operate against every day.
Don Mabry, SVP Global Trade Solutions, Infios
Who this report is for
Built for practitioners making real decisions
Managing modal strategy, network resilience and margin exposure under ongoing policy volatility
Managing duty timing, cash flow, and product‑level margin impact
Planning operational resilience and competitive positioning for a trade environment that may not stabilize
The full report goes deeper: the mechanics behind each pattern, breakdowns by mode and origin, and the capability framework companies are building to compete in a tariff-volatile trade environment.